In this episode of Fast Talk, we take on a controversial subject. Recently, a big debate kicked up on the Internet. Some cycling experts stated that Functional Threshold Power (FTP) was dead. Many of the big names in training got involved in the debate of the value of FTP, as well as what is and isn’t current when it comes to creating a rider’s power profile and determining their training zones. We didn’t get involved in the debate–we consider everyone in the debate to be friends at Fast Talk–but we also couldn’t resist a good scientific question.
So, we got a number of top coaches into a room to hash out this important question: What is the best way for cyclists to determine their individual training profiles?
- Coyle, E. F., Feltner, M. E., Kautz, S. A., Hamilton, M. T., Montain, S. J., Baylor, A. M., et al. (1991). Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 23(1), 93-107.
- Daniels, J. (1998). Daniels’ running formula. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- Faude, O., Kindermann, W., & Meyer, T. (2009). Lactate threshold concepts: how valid are they? Sports Med, 39(6), 469-490.
- Joyner, M. J., & Coyle, E. F. (2008). Endurance exercise performance: the physiology of champions. J Physiol, 586(1), 35-44.
- Pinot, J., & Grappe, F. (2010). The ‘Power Profile’ for determining the physical capacities of a cyclist. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 13, 103-104.